|
|
KNOCK Interview Jonathan Evison w/ Bryan Tomasovich |
||
|
Bryan Tomasovich: How much of All About Lulu is autobiographical?
BT: You say American, and reading the blurbs for
Lulu, it seems like everybody says something about the novel being American.
What is it thats so American about this novel? JE: Aside from some of the historical earmarks,
Im guessing it has something to do with this idea of possibilitiesthe
difference between where we come from and where we can go. America simply
offers more latitude in this respect than many places. Not to say that
theres not a very complex and often debilitating class structure
in place in America, not to say the dictates and obstacles are the same
for the various social and economic strata, but the fact remains
whether or not weve got our collective tail between our legs and
were compelled to sew maple leafs onto our jean jackets when we
travel abroad, whether or not a small percentage of entitled fucks are
doing their damndest to limit the rest of us in our pursuit of liberty
and freedom and happiness, whether or not you think the constitution is
a load of shit, or you believe John Wayne was gay the American dream
is alive and well. Ask the Mexican working in your garden if you dont
believe me. I guess my novel is optimistic in this respect and Americans
from Walt Whitman to Donald Rumsfeld are nothing if not optimistic.
So, yeah, I guess thats maybe whats so American about my novel.
Or the fact that theres so many hot dogs in it. BT: Why bodybuilding? JE: Well, for starters, because I spent much of
my childhood around itI have a pretty intimate knowledge of the
sport. Bodybuilding really relates thematically to the book in a number
of ways. The idea of strength. Discipline. Definition. Self-improvement.
Dualism, in the Cartesian senseyou know, here is Will, this guy
raised in an environment where everything is measured in mounds of muscle
and flesh, and where does he find his center but in a disembodied voice? BT: What about the Miller obsession with meat? JE: Lets face it, meat is funny. And, of
course, youve got half the dualism equation again. BT: The book really isnt all about Lulu,
is it? JE: Nah, its Wills story. Lulu was
never intended to be the narrative engine. I would liken Lulus role
to a shadow of an even bigger shadow under which Will lives much of his
lifeand out from under which he must emerge to discover himself.
Some editorsbig house editors, ahemwere frustrated by this.
But its called All About Lulu, they said. We need more Lulu! Where
is Lulu when this happens, and that happens? Pretty dumb questions, as
far as Im concerned. I say to them: Why isnt Lolita called
Humbert Humbert? BT: What has the commercial publishing industry
done so wrong to you? JE: What troubles me specifically, is the title-driven
market. This likeness factor which seems to be dictating everything from
acquisitions to jacket designs. No wonder our literature isnt flourishing!
No wonder theres a dearth of originality! Christ, how many books
in the last year feature vintage lamp shades or a woman holding an apple
in her hand? How many books are called The So-and-Sos Daughter?
It used to be about the author. Steinbeck wrote at least four commercial
flops before he broke out. The current paradigm simply doesnt allow
for that. If you dont break out with your first novel, your book
is remaindered, and youre contemplating a name change. Thats
the corporation at workthe quarterly return, the quick buck. See,
the family business sets its sights on the long-term, the corporation
just wants to turn a quick buck. The irony of this is that theyre
shooting themselves in the foot. A lot of people have one novel, or one
memoir in them. The real resource is the people that have ten in them
the people that cant help but produce. Instead of trying to catch
lightning in a bottle with the next Kite Runner, the next Eat, Pray, Love,
the next Water for Elephants, they should be building long-term readerships
for their authors. BT: Nabokov, Steinbeck
name some other authors
who youre under the influence of. JE: First and foremost, probably Dickens. He taught
me to create my characters with love, he taught me to juggle them, he
taught me to put them through hell, and he taught me not to forsake them,
even in death. I was extremely enamored of John Fante in my adolescence.
It was partly a peasant thing, and partly a writerly thinghis whole
hopelessly youthful and unapologetic brand of fear and arrogance really
spoke to me. I connected with Steinbeck early on, as well. His characters
were so conflicted. Nothing is more compelling to me than a conflicted
character. Old Fyodor, too, for that matter, influenced me in this way.
Bohumil Hrabal, everybodys favorite Czech pub crawler and dirty
old man, also made a big impression on me with his sensuality and huge
appetites. BT: What about contemporary writers? JE: Jim Othmer, Keith Dixon, Tim Sandlin BT: All the people who blurbed your book. JE: Well, yeah. Thats why I sought them out.
Their opinions matter to me. These guys are writers. Writers writers.
Writers who reinvent themselves every time they take a crack at the novel.
I like David Mitchell for his ambition, I like Michael Chabon for his
silky prose, I like Sam Lipsyte for his irreverence. BT: These guys are all guys, too. Any chance you
learn anything from women? JE: Good point. Probably, Ive concerned myself
a bit more with dudes, cause Im a dude. But certainly there
are tons of women writers whom I adore and who have influenced me, particularly
my capacity to write female characters: Marilynne Robinson, Flannery OConnor,
Carson McCullers, and George Eliot to name a few. BT: Whats next for you? JE: As far as writing, Ive been working on
a real beast for the past two yearsthree, if you count the research.
Its very different from Lulu. Its called West of Here. Its
much larger in scope. Third person, a gazillion POVs. Bigfoot, naked Indians,
Colonel Sanders, a lot of ecological destruction. Maybe its a disaster,
but I dont care, its exhilarating if nothing else, though
at times a little overwhelming. I have to wake up at five in the morning
six days a week just to keep a handle on it. BT: Any advice for novelists trying to break out?
Read an excerpt from All About Lulu in KNOCK #9 |
|||
|
All ideas and expressions contained herein represent the opinions of the authors whose names appear on each contribution, not Antioch University Seattle or the staff of KNOCK. Copyright ©2004-2007 by KNOCK, Antioch University Seattle. Trademark law protects Antioch names and logos. |